Russian version English version
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Information for Readers and Authors
Current Issue
Archive
Contact Us
Search

Send manuscript
 


Volume 19   Issue 2   Year 2024
Nikitiuk A.S.

Simulation of Constant Rate Loading of Eukaryotic Cells Using Statistical Thermodynamic Methods

Mathematical Biology & Bioinformatics. 2024;19(2):304-321.

doi: 10.17537/2024.19.304.

References

  1. Po A., Giuliani A., Masiello M.G., Cucina A., Catizone A., Ricci G., Chiacchiarini M., Tafani M., Ferretti E., Bizzarri M. Phenotypic transitions enacted by simulated microgravity do not alter coherence in gene transcription profile. npj Microgravity. 2019;5(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41526-019-0088-x
  2. Han S.B., Kim J.K., Lee G., Kim D.H. Mechanical Properties of Materials for Stem Cell Differentiation. Adv. Biosyst. 2020;4(11):2000247. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202000247
  3. Isomursu A., Park K.-Y., Hou J., Cheng B., Mathieu M., Shamsan G.A., Fuller B., Kasim J., Mahmoodi M.M., Lu T.J. et al. Directed cell migration towards softer environments. Nat. Mater. 2022;21(9):1081–1090. doi: 10.1038/s41563-022-01294-2
  4. Lesne A., Bourgine P. Morphogenesis: Origins of patterns and shapes. Springer Science & Business Media. 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13174-5
  5. Paszek M.J., Zahir N., Johnson K.R., Lakins J.N., Rozenberg G.I., Gefen A., Reinhart-King C.A., Margulies S.S., Dembo M., Boettiger D. et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005;8(3):241–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.010
  6. Zbiral B., Weber A., Vivanco M. d. M., Toca-Herrera J.L. Characterization of Breast Cancer Aggressiveness by Cell Mechanics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(15):12208. doi: 10.3390/ijms241512208
  7. Georges P.C., Hui J.J., Gombos Z., McCormick M.E., Wang A.Y., Uemura M., Mick R., Janmey P.A., Furth E.E., Wells R.G. Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: Implications for fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. - Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2007;293(6):G1147–G1154. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00032.2007
  8. Mattei G., Ahluwalia A. Sample, testing and analysis variables affecting liver mechanical properties: A review. Acta Biomaterialia. 2016;45:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.055
  9. van Tienderen G.S., Conboy J., Muntz I., Willemse J., Tieleman J., Monfils K., Schurink I.J., Demmers J.A.A., Doukas M., Koenderink G.H. et al. Tumor decellularization reveals proteomic and mechanical characteristics of the extracellular matrix of primary liver cancer. Biomater. Adv. 2023;146:213289. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213289
  10. Puliafito A., Hufnagel L., Neveu P., Streichan S., Sigal A., Fygenson D.K., Shraiman B.I. Collective and single cell behavior in epithelial contact inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012;109(3):739–744. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007809109
  11. Suki B., Bates J.H.T. Lung tissue mechanics as an emergent phenomenon. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011;110(4):1111–1118. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01244.2010
  12. Moeendarbary E., Harris A.R. Cell mechanics: Principles, practices, and prospects. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2014;6(5):371–388. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1275
  13. de Sousa J.S., Freire R.S., Sousa F.D., Radmacher M., Silva A.F.B., Ramos M.V., Monteiro-Moreira A.C.O., Mesquita F.P., Moraes M.E.A., Montenegro R.C., Oliveira C.L.N. Double power-law viscoelastic relaxation of living cells encodes motility trends. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61631-w
  14. Darling E.M., Zauscher S., Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of zonal articular chondrocytes measured by atomic force microscopy. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2006;14(6):571–579. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.12.003
  15. Eldridge W.J., Ceballos S., Shah T., Park H.S., Steelman Z.A., Zauscher S., Wax A. Shear Modulus Measurement by Quantitative Phase Imaging and Correlation with Atomic Force Microscopy. Biophys. J. Biophysical Society. 2019;117(4):696–705. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.07.008
  16. Efremov Y.M., Kotova S.L., Timashev P.S. Viscoelasticity in simple indentation-cycle experiments: a computational study. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70361-y
  17. Kollmannsberger P., Fabry B. Linear and nonlinear rheology of living cells. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2011;41:75–97. doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100351
  18. Guo X., Yan G., Benyahia L., Sahraoui S. Fitting stress relaxation experiments with fractional Zener model to predict high frequency moduli of polymeric acoustic foams. Mech. Time-Dependent Mater. 2016;20(4):523–533. doi: 10.1007/s11043-016-9310-3
  19. Babahosseini H., Carmichael B., Strobl J.S., Mahmoodi S.N., Agah M. Sub-cellular force microscopy in single normal and cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015;463(4):587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.05.100
  20. Carmichael B., Babahosseini H., Mahmoodi S.N., Agah M. The fractional viscoelastic response of human breast tissue cells. Phys. Biol. 2015;12(4):046001. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/12/4/046001
  21. Laurent V.M., Fodil R., Cañadas P., Féréol S., Louis B., Planus E., Isabey D. Partitioning of cortical and deep cytoskeleton responses from transient magnetic bead twisting. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2003;31(10):1263–1278. doi: 10.1114/1.1616932
  22. Moreno-Flores S., Benitez R., Vivanco M.D.M., Toca-Herrera J.L. Stress relaxation and creep on living cells with the atomic force microscope: A means to calculate elastic moduli and viscosities of cell components. Nanotechnology. 2010;21(44):445101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/44/445101
  23. Efremov Y.M., Okajima T., Raman A. Measuring viscoelasticity of soft biological samples using atomic force microscopy. Soft Matter. 2019;16(1):64–81. doi: 10.1039/C9SM01020C
  24. Brazhe A.R., Brazhe N.A., Rodionova N.N., Yusipovich A.I., Ignatyev P.S., Maksimov G.V., Mosekilde E., Sosnovtseva O.V. Non-invasive study of nerve fibres using laser interference microscopy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2008;366(1880):3463–3481. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0107
  25. Beloglazova Y., Nikitiuk A., Voronina A., Gagarskikh O., Bayandin Y., Naimark O., Grishko V. Label-free single cell viability assay using laser interference microscopy. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(7). doi: 10.3390/biology10070590
  26. Van Vliet K.J., Bao G., Suresh S. The biomechanics toolbox: Experimental approaches for living cells and biomolecules. Acta Mater. 2003;51(19):5881–5905. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.001
  27. Hao Y., Cheng S., Tanaka Y., Hosokawa Y., Yalikun Y., Li M. Mechanical properties of single cells: Measurement methods and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020;45:107648. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107648
  28. Shitikova M.V. Fractional Operator Viscoelastic Models in Dynamic Problems of Mechanics of Solids: A Review. Mech. Solids. 2022;57(1):1–33. doi: 10.3103/S0025654422010022
  29. Nikitiuk A.S. Parameter identification of viscoelastic cell models based on force curves and wavelet transform. Comput. Res. Model. 2023;15(6):1653–1672. doi: 10.20537/2076-7633-2023-15-6-1653-1672
  30. Nikitiuk A.S., Koshkina A.A., Bayandin Y.V., Naimark O.B. On thermodynamics and relaxation properties of eukaryotic cells. Int. J. Non. Linear. Mech. 2023;157:104532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2023.104532
  31. Lu H., Wang B., Ma J., Huang G., Viswanathan H. Measurement of creep compliance of solid polymers by nanoindentation. Mech. Time-Dependent Mater. 2003;7(3–4):189–207. doi: 10.1023/B:MTDM.0000007217.07156.9b
  32. Kren A.P., Machikhin A.S., Bulatov M.F. Determination of the creep function using atomic force microscope. Mater. Lett. 2020;259:126872. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.126872
  33. Gittes F., Schnurr B., Olmsted P.D., MacKintosh F.C., Schmidt C.F. Microscopic viscoelasticity: Shear moduli of soft materials determined from thermal fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997;79(17):3286. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3286
  34. Ziemann F., Rädler J., Sackmann E. Local measurements of viscoelastic moduli of entangled actin networks using an oscillating magnetic bead micro-rheometer. Biophys. J. 1994;66(6):2210–2216. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)81017-3
  35. Mainardi F., Spada G. Creep, relaxation and viscosity properties for basic fractional models in rheology. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2011;193(1):133–160. doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2011-01387-1
  36. Xu H., Jiang X. Creep constitutive models for viscoelastic materials based on fractional derivatives. Comput. Math. with Appl. 2017;73(6):1377–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.05.002
  37. Gao Y., Zhao B., Yin D., Yuan L. A general fractional model of creep response for polymer materials: Simulation and model comparison. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022;139(5). doi: 10.1002/app.51577
  38. Demir T. Mittag-Leffler Function and Integration of the Mittag-Leffler Function. 2022;March.
  39. Lin D.C., Shreiber D.I., Dimitriadis E.K., Horkay F. Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: Numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2009;8(5):345–358. doi: 10.1007/s10237-008-0139-9
  40. Nikitiuk A.S., Korznikova E.A., Dmitriev S.V., Naimark O.B. Dna breathers and cell dynamics. Math. Biol. Bioinforma. 2019;14(1). doi: 10.17537/2019.14.137
  41. Spinelli J.B., Zaganjor E. Mitochondrial efficiency directs cell fate. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022;24(2):125–126. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00834-3
  42. Wang K., Qin Y., Chen Y. In situ AFM detection of the stiffness of the in situ exposed cell nucleus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Cell Res. 2021;1868(5):118985. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.118985
  43. Yu W., Sharma S., Rao E., Rowat A.C., Gimzewski J.K., Han D., Rao J. Cancer cell mechanobiology: a new frontier for cancer research. J. Natl. Cancer Cent. 2022;2(1):10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2021.11.007
  44. de Gennes P.G., Prost J., Pelcovits R. The Physics of Liquid Crystals. Phys. Today. 1995;48(5):70–71. doi: 10.1063/1.2808028
  45. Shliomos M.I., Raikher Y.L., Shliomos, M.I. Raikher Y.L., Shliomos M.I., Raikher Y.L., Shliomos, M.I. Raikher Y.L., Shliomos M.I., Raikher Y.L. Orientational ordering and mechanical properties of solid polymers. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 1978;5:1760–1783.
  46. Deshpande V.S., McMeeking R.M., Evans A.G. A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103(38):14015–14020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605837103
  47. Nikitiuk A.S., Bayandin Y.V., Naimark O.B. Statistical thermodynamics of DNA with open states. Phys. A Stat. Mech. its Appl. 2022;607:128156. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.128156
  48. Bilalov D.A., Bayandin Y.V., Naimark O.B. Mathematical modeling of failure process of AlMg2.5 alloy during highand very high cycle fatigue. Comput. Contin. Mech. 2018;11(3):323–334. doi: 10.7242/1999-6691/2018.11.3.24
  49. Rebelo L.M., De Sousa J.S., Mendes Filho J., Radmacher M. Comparison of the viscoelastic properties of cells from different kidney cancer phenotypes measured with atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology. 2013;24(5):055102. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/5/055102
  50. Rebêlo L.M., De Sousa J.S., Filho J.M., Schäpe J., Doschke H., Radmacher M. Microrheology of cells with magnetic force modulation atomic force microscopy. Soft Matter. 2014;10(13):2141–2149. doi: 10.1039/C3SM52045E
  51. Rigato A., Miyagi A., Scheuring S., Rico F. High-frequency microrheology reveals cytoskeleton dynamics in living cells. Nat. Phys. 2017;13(8). doi: 10.1038/nphys4104
  52. Bausch A.R., Ziemann F., Boulbitch A.A., Jacobson K., Sackmann E. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. Biophys. J. 1998;75(4):2038–2049. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77646-5
  53. Efremov Y.M., Wang W.H., Hardy S.D., Geahlen R.L., Raman A. Measuring nanoscale viscoelastic parameters of cells directly from AFM force-displacement curves. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01784-3
  54. Naimark O.B., Bayandin Y.V., Zocher M.A. Collective properties of defects, multiscale plasticity, and shock induced phenomena in solids. Phys. Mesomech. 2017;20(1):10–30. doi: 10.1134/S1029959917010027
  55. Roylance D. Engineering viscoelasticity. In: Modules in Mechanics of Materials. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001. https://web.mit.edu/course/3/3.11/www/modules/visco.pdf (accessed 20 April 2024).
  56. Thoumine O., Ott A. Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. J. Cell Sci. 1997;110(17):2109–2116. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110.17.2109
  57. Laperrousaz B., Drillon G., Berguiga L., Nicolini F., Audit B., Satta V.M., Arneodo A., Argoul F. From elasticity to inelasticity in cancer cell mechanics: A loss of scale-invariance. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016;1760(1). doi: 10.1063/1.4960259
Table of Contents
Original Article
Math. Biol. Bioinf.
2024;19(2):304-321
doi: 10.17537/2024.19.304
published in Russian

Abstract (rus.)
Abstract (eng.)
Full text (rus., pdf)
References

 
  Copyright IMPB RAS © 2005-2024