Russian version English version
Volume 17   Issue 2   Year 2022
Mikhakhanova T.S.1,2, Voropaeva O.F.1

The Trigger Model of the Dynamics of Acute and Chronic Aseptic Inflammation

Mathematical Biology & Bioinformatics. 2022;17(2):266-288.

doi: 10.17537/2022.17.266.

References

  1. Vospalenie. Rukovodstvo dlia vrachei (Inflammation. Guide for doctors). Eds. V.V. Serov, V.S. Paukov. Moscow, 1995 (in Russ.).
  2. Yarilin A. A. Fundamentals of immunology: Textbook. M.: Medicine, 1999 (in Russ.).
  3. Voropaeva O.F., Bayadilov T.V. A mathematical model of aseptic inflammation dynamics. Journal of Applied and Industrial Mathematics. 2020;14(4):779–791. doi: 10.1134/S1990478920040158
  4. Nagaraja S., Wallqvist A., Reifman J., Mitrophanov A. Y. Computational approach to characterize causative factors and molecular indicators of chronic wound inflammation. Journal of Immunology. 2014;192:1824–1834. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302481
  5. Mori R., Kondo T., Ohshima T., Ishida Y., Mukaida N. Accelerated wound healing in tumor necrosis factor p55-deficient mice with reduced leukocyte infiltration. FASEB J. 2002;16:963–974. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0776com
  6. Mirza R., DiPietro L. A., Koh T.J. Selective and specific macrophage ablation is detrimental to wound healing in mice. Amer. J. Pathology. 2009;175(6):2454–2462. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090248
  7. Mukai K., Komatsu E., Nakajima Y., Urai T., Nasruddin J. Sugama, Nakatani T. The effect of 17b-estradiol on cutaneous wound healing in protein-malnourished ovariectomized female mouse model. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e115564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115564
  8. Pan S.-C., Li C.-Y., Kuo C.-Y., Kuo Y.-Z., Fang W.-Y., Huang Y.-H., Hsieh T.-C., Kao H.-Y., Kuo Y., et al. The p53-S100 A2 positive feedback loop negatively regulates epithelialization in cutaneous wound healing. Sci. Reports. 2018;8:963–974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23697-5
  9. Deng Z., Yin J., Wei L., Kotian R.N., Gao S., Yi Z., Xiao W., Li W., Li Y. The effect of earthworm extract on promoting skin wound healing. Biosci. Reports. 2018;38:BSR20171366. doi: 10.1042/BSR20171366
  10. Bystrom J., Evans I., Newson J., Stables M., Toor I., van Rooijen N., Crawford M., Colville-Nash P., Farrow S., Gilroy D. W. Resolutionphase macrophages possess a unique inflammatory phenotype that is controlled by cAMP. Blood. 2008;112:4117–4127. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-12-129767
  11. Yang L., Qiu C. X. , Ludlow A., Ferguson M. W., Brunner G. Active transforming growth factor-b in wound repair: determination using a new assay. Amer. J. Pathology. 1999;154:105–111. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65256-X
  12. Antoniades H.N., Galanopoulos T., Neville-Golden J., Kiritsy C.P., Lynch S.E. p53 expression during normal tissue regeneration in response to acute cutaneous injury in swine. J. Clin. Invest. 1994;93:2206–2214. doi: 10.1172/JCI117217
  13. Engelhardt E., Toksoy A., Goebeler M., Debus S., Br¨ocker E.B., Gillitzer R. Chemokines IL-8, GROalpha, MCP-1, IP-10, and Mig are sequentially and differentially expressed during phase-specific infiltration of leukocyte subsets in human wound healing. Amer. J. Pathology. 1998;153:1849–1860. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65699-4
  14. Kum W.W., Cameron S.B., Hung R.W., Kalyan S., Chow A.W. Temporal sequence and kinetics of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion induced by toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Infect. Immunol. 2001;69:7544–7549. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7544-7549.2001
  15. Leal E.C., Carvalho E., Tellechea A., Kafanas A., Tecilazich F., Kearney C., Kuchibhotla S., Auster M. E., Kokkotou E., Mooney D. J., LoGerfo F. W., Pradhan-Nabzdyk L., Veves A. Substance P promotes wound healing in diabetes by modulating inflammation and macrophage phenotype. American Journal of Pathology. 2015;185(6):1638–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.02.011
  16. Dewald O., Ren G., Duerr G. D., Zoerlein M., Klemm C., Gersch C., Tincey S., Michael L. H., Entman M. L., Frangogiannis N. G. Of mice and dogs: Species-specific differences in the inflammatory response following myocardial infarction. Am. J. Pathol. 2004;164:665–677. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63154-9
  17. Nagaraja S., Chen L., Zhou J., Zhao Y., Fine D., DiPietro L. A., Reifman J., Mitrophanov A. Y. Predictive analysis of mechanistic triggers and mitigation strategies for pathological scarring in skin wounds. Journal of Immunology. 2017;198:832–841. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601273
  18. Safferling K., Sütterlin T., Westphal K., Ernst C., Breuhahn K., James M., Jäger D., Halama N., Grabe N. Wound healing revised: A novel reepithelialization mechanism revealed by in vitro and in silico models. Cell Biol. 2013;203(4):691–709. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201212020
  19. Fouda A.Y., Kozak A., Alhusban A., Switzer J.A., Fagan S.C. Anti-inflammatory IL-10 is upregulated in both hemispheres after experimental ischemic stroke: Hypertension blunts the response. Experimental and Translational Stroke Medicine. 2013;5(12). doi: 10.1186/2040-7378-5-12
  20. Pradhan L., Nabzdyk C., Andersen N. D., LoGerfo F. W., Veves A. Inflammation and neuropeptides: The connection in diabetic wound healing. Expert. Rev. Mol. Med. 2013;11. Article No. e2. doi: 10.1017/S1462399409000945
  21. Zverkin A.M., Kamenskii G.A., Norkin S.B., Elsholts L.E. Differential equations with a perturbed argument. Russian Mathematical Surveys. 1962;17(2):61–164 (in Russ.). doi: 10.1070/RM1962v017n02ABEH001128
  22. Myshkis A.D, Elsholts L.E. Some results and problems in the theory of differential equations. 1967;22(2):21–57 (in Russ.). doi: 10.1070/RM1967v022n02ABEH001209
  23. Elsholts L.E., Norkin S.B. Introduction to the theory of differential equations with a deviating argument. Moscow: Nauka, 1971 (in Russ.).
  24. Akhmerov R.R., Kamenskii M.I., Potapov A.S., Rodkina A.E., Sadovskii B.N. The theory of equations of neutral type. Itogi Nauki i Tekhn. Ser. Mat. Anal. 1982;19:55–126 (in Russ.).
  25. Krasovsky N.N., Kotelnikova A.N. The fate of one approach to the study of hereditary systems. Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. 2004;32:12–24 (in Russ.).
  26. Vodopyanov E.S., Demidenko G.V. Asymptotic stability of solutions of linear differential equations with a lagging argument under perturbation of coefficients. Mathematical Notes of YaGU. 2011;18:32–40 (in Russ.).
  27. Fadeev S.I., Kogai V.V., Khlebodarova T.M., Likhoshvai V.A. On the numerical study of periodic solutions to delay equations in biological models. J. Appl. Industr. Math. 2016;10(1):86–96. doi: 10.1134/S1990478916010105
  28. Luzyanina T., Sieber J., Engelborghs K., Samaey G., Roose D. Numerical bifurcation analysis of mathematical models with time delays with the package DDE-BIFTOOL. Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2017;12(2):496–520. doi: 10.17537/2017.12.469
  29. Pertsev N.V., Pichugin B.Yu., Pichugina A.N. Application of M-matrices for the study of mathematical models of living systems. Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics. 2018;13:104–131 (in Russ.). doi: 10.17537/2018.13.208
  30. Golubyatnikov V.P., Kirillova N.E. On cycles in models of functioning of circular gene networks. Sib. J. Pure and Appl. Math. 2018;18:54–63.
  31. Holodniok M., Klich A., Kubichek M., Marek M. Metody analiza nelineynykh dinamicheskikh modeley (Methods of the analysis for nonlinear dynamic models). Moscow: Mir, 1991 (in Russ.).
  32. Zobnin A.I., Sokolova O.V. Computer algebra in the Sage system. Study guide. Moscow: Publishing House of Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 2011 (in Russ.).
Table of Contents Original Article
Math. Biol. Bioinf.
2022;17(2):266-288
doi: 10.17537/2022.17.266
published in Russian

Abstract (rus.)
Abstract (eng.)
Full text (rus., pdf)
References

 

  Copyright IMPB RAS © 2005-2024